Instead, we should be celebrating their ingenuity in seeing a wildly undeserved market and succeeding at building something successful yo cater to it. This is something we can all aspire to instead of making it about gender.
But in reality, they likely went from "millionaires" to "multi-millionaires". At least, it looks like their revenue (and thus estimated company value) grew linearly in recent years:
It could be written far better without mentioning numbers.
Only really true in America and well see how that holds up as we progress with America's collapse.
As Skeletor once said: WAT?!
If you got millions you are part of the 0.5%.
It doesn't. However people do jump to conclusion. I also assumed that it's a rags to riches story, however incorrect it is.
Just about as much as titles like to feed this habit. They're designed to leave the wrong impression in order to trigger a reaction.
"Jeff Bezos becomes a trillionaire thanks to lettuce". It's going to make you wonder, draw conclusions, call it ridiculous, want to tell someone about it. But yeah, I mean lettuce is what's also sold at Whole Foods, and that may be what takes Bezos from $999.99bn to $1tn so it may be technically correct. The least useful kind of correct.
"Millionaire twin sisters greatly increase their wealth after targeting female gamer market" doesn't have the same pull although it's just as accurate. But it gives too much information and you're no longer interested in clicking.
Regardless, props to them for finding a niche to serve and get rich(er) from, especially in a market that doesn't cater very well to that segment.
That's the content of the article, and it's newsworthiness is hard to fault here. Not sure why people need to make loud defences of IDW personalities or invoke statistical differences in competencies across genders.