It's as if we redefined the density of water in winter so when you measure a frozen container of it the different volume yields the same weight.
It might have made sense when there was a single clock in a whole village!
But now with the planet probably containing 10x as many clocks as humans this is just complete lunacy.
Oddly, this is exactly how the US "bushel" was defined -- it measures a mass of a specific type of grain at a particular moisture content, the idea being that the "quantity" of grain shouldn't change as it is dried.
My point is that the chain of determining the measurement of a natural value should start at the value, not at what we want it to be to then bend the value over backwards to be that then.
So the example doesn't fall apart with a temperature-/moisture-dependent constant:
The point is that the constant should not be arbitrarily changed to achieve a desired value. The constant should be measured/defined and stay as such.
This is a mere pipe dream. Business aren't going to change their hours to different seasons. It would be much easier to just stay on DST then try and coerce business to change their employee hours based off the season.
But businesses can elect to smear their seasonal modifications with any granularity they want, avoiding severe shock to circadian rhythm, thus avoiding the financial hit!
I guess DST could theoretically smear as well, but that is way more difficult for people to wrap their heads around.
Sure, but that’s just like saying that any two people could arrange things to do something at the same time and place by communicating a precise astronomical phenomenon at that place, like the azimuth of the Sun, then both people can work out when that will be relative to their personal schedules.
Of course, the point of widely-used regional standards for timekeeping is simply to avoid the need to communicate and calculate precise phenomena to represent a local time.
I tell people, Daylight Savings in March is my favorite day of the year.
I hate that in the part of year we need daylight the most we give up more daylight?!?!?
We now have electricity and few of us need to milk cows or plow fields.
The 8-5 for us is stationary.
It is never enjoyable to leave the inside of a building (factory or office) in darkness. Unless you just finished the night shift, I guess ..
I'll let the politicians decide what they want to do, but I know I'll never fully understand why we take away evening sunlight with our stationary 8-5.
(Of course, ST is the opposite effect.) I care less about light in the morning as I tend not to be a particular early bird and where I live it's pretty dark first thing in the morning even with ST.
The farm animals do not understand the "time of day" on a human clock, so the farm work occurs around the animals rhythms, not the "clock on the wall". Moving the time of day backwards or forwards just changes what number is on the clock face when the cows are ready to be milked.
Which changes whether the children are there to do the milking, or at school instead, right?
And coding embedded systems to handle DST edge cases just gets obnoxious when unnecessary.
You want to shift your hours? Adjust your own schedule, don’t demand imposing a change that disrupts mine.
I think we can't "win" with time-related legislation. Is this apple cart something our govt really needs to be upsetting right now?