> “There was no immediate explanation provided for the blaze, which erupted just two days after the French cloud computing firm kicked off plans for an initial public offering.“
Very interesting.
Very interesting.
Simpler than whatever you're impling a
Simple is: fires happen in buildings due to failures. There was a nonhuman failure like in millions of other cases. No need for a conspiracy.
Otherwise, with your logic, god explains everything because "it's simple"
It was only a few days ago that it was been announced there is an unprecedented hack in progress of Microsoft Exchange / Outlook Web App that is reportedly being launched by the HAFNIUM hacking group in China using VPSs hosted around the world.
I'm not saying arson is involved, but the possibility of arson needs to be impartially investigated. Admittedly, the falsifiability of the theory is also difficult, because even tracing back the fire to an electrical fault doesn't immediately preclude it from being a deliberate act.
[1] https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/a-basic-timeline-of-the-...
However due to functioning fire suppression measures it didn't burn the entire building down.
With any fire there’s always the possibility of arson. With fires that impact commercial real estate I’d be surprise if the occurrence of arson is not more common.
It’s just interesting that’s all.