Hubble is mainly a set of cameras attached to the telescope, it doesn't have anything comparable to what you linked. Yes, I am aware of all the advantages of ground based astronomy, which just got a huge boom by segmented mirrors basically removing the mirror size limit. The flexibility and costs of ground-based astronomy are superior for anything which can be done well from the ground. I have nowhere suggested to stop or defund ground based astronomy. We need ground based astronomy and space based one. So we need to come up with a replacement of Hubble, thats where my suggestions come from.

And yes, I am aware of the challenges of space-going equipment. But if a system is designed for a life time of rather 5 than 30 years, things become a bit easier. Also, if you look at the camera equipment of Perseverance, a lot of it is off-shelve, only slightly enhanced for its intended purpose.