Hacker News Reader

Comment by ArkanExplorer | Hacker News Reader

"As they adapted to hunting... brain volume [grew] from 650cc to 1,500cc."

"As humans moved into permanent settlements and became farmers, their brain size decreased to its current volume of 1300-1400cc."

Its interesting that we today have smaller brains than our prehistoric ancestors.

I wonder if we can look through our genetic code and find some remnants of this past, and re-engineer the relevant genes into future generations?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01602...

Given that Asians (1364cc) have a larger brain size than Whites (1347cc) and Blacks (1267cc), did these kind of pre-historic trends also play out differently across different landmasses?

View on HN

Another thing to be cautious of is that brain volume is only a proxy for e.g. neuron count, which is itself a proxy for intelligence.

Volume may be the only archaeological data available, but whales (8kg) and elephants (5kg) have brains many times larger than ours (~1.3kg), and even adjusting for body mass doesn’t make humans top of the pile — famously, the brain-to-body mass ratio of shrews is higher than humans’.

Might want to check your facts. Especially since you're citing this person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton

Do we really currently use our brains as efficiently as possible?

The decrease in size could be the outcome of one of the bottlenecks, like the one 200k years ago.

The problem could be with distribution.

In a hunter-gatherer society, all members require this intelligence described in the article.

In a hierarchical early agricultural society, only the ruling classes and to an extent middle classes do.

Thus you end up with a distribution of intelligence (and brain size) aligned along caste, with a wide range. Who you sample influences your measurements.

Why do you assume that being a subsistence farmer requires less intelligence than being a landlord?

Peasants were poor, not stupid. [1]

Their landlords may have written about them as if they were, but they were hardly unbiased observers.

[1] https://acoup.blog/2020/07/24/collections-bread-how-did-they...

Is there a particular reason that you cite a 20-year old, paywalled study that claims black people are genetically stupider than other races here?

Polynesians have the most average CCs of brain. There's no correlation between this and smart.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com