To be honest, this is somewhat of a disappointment. The companies that solve 'hard', core-tech problems like Google and Microsoft are falling behind. Sad. Sad.
To be honest, this is somewhat of a disappointment. The companies that solve 'hard', core-tech problems like Google and Microsoft are falling behind. Sad. Sad.
GOOG can't expand its userbase much more (since it's already, to first approximation, everyone on the planet), but it can certainly find new ways to give 'em stuff they're willing to pay for.
Partly, they are cursed by success: a new business would have to be stunningly lucrative to be more than a rounding error of their current business, it is so incredibly successful. According to the Innovator's Dilemma, they would have to spin out an autonomous unit that could get excited about small wins and shape itself to them.
But google doesn't do that - they have all these fun little 'entrepreneurial' projects, but none of them mean anything to google organizationally, because they don't, and virtually can't, impact the bottom line. They're just PR.
Google is being properly judged by the investment community now that the IPO has passed and the "hype" has faded away.
Off the top of my head (although it's not technically a single product release) taking mobile OS market share from low single digits to just shy of 40% in under two years strikes me as a pretty significant accomplishment by any reasonable standard.