I don't think this is an argument, it's just stating what happens.
In fact they tried to downplay it at first. Only after Italy's massacre they picked up, and that's for optics, as it became an "arms race" between governments. You can't seem standing when others do something. Plus it was a good chance to increase tech profits, make structural changes they wanted to make, and get a "great reset". And a lot of cushy opportunities for big tenders...
And then you have people who would like to live but don't want to depend on family members for everything.
Death on command is the closest thing to Hitler's eugenics.
Precisely nobody is proposing "Death on command". From the article:
> ...the person must:
> - suffer a "serious or incurable illness" or a "chronic or incapacitating" condition that causes "intolerable suffering"
> - be an adult Spanish national or a legal resident
> - be "fully aware and conscious" when they make the request, which has to be submitted twice in writing, 15 days apart
> A doctor can reject the request if the requirements have not been met. It must be approved by a second medic and by an evaluation body.
> Any medic can withdraw on grounds of "conscience" from taking part in the procedure.