Sci-Hub: Police warn students and universities against 'Pirate Bay of science'
news.sky.com
news.sky.com
In this case 'police' means 'the City of London Police'. I wonder if they're busy like Beverley Hills police.
OT, but interesting: When the Shard was built across the river in Southwark (in London, but not The City Of London), The City started making noise trying to annex it.
Ethically, locking up the research just might be worse than piracy.
We are, sadly, locked in by the predatory publishers. However, I don't know a single peer who does not support open access and even sci-hub.
The only party losing are publishers, who add zero value to the process. Like leeches, they suck dry academic researchers, simply because they are the gate-keepers of status and quality signals.
I use SH to get access to papers so I can write for university. Without SH I would be looking at at least 500 US just for memberships to papers (some of them only retail as single docs).
While I understand people want to keep 'their' knowledge paywalled I think humanity doesn't truly benefit from this attitude, many of this scientific paper repositories are acting as ransomware to knowledge than could potentially benefit a tremendous amount of people should they decide to allow us lesser people benefit from raw knowledge.
Aaron Swartz.