It's a travesty that the EFF is linking Selam G.'s blog post as evidence of RMS's poor behavior. That article grossly mischaracterizes RMS's statements and makes it sound like he defended Epstein, which he didn't. This means that the author of this statement didn't bother to read RMS actual comments on the Epstein-Minsky issue, or that he linked Selam G.'s hit piece on purpose. Either way, this portrays EFF as an organization that doesn't care about truth. Also, I would've assumed that EFF, an organization that has promoting free speech on the Internet as one of its stated goals [1], would be against mob justice, but apparently these days they are more concerned with petty virtue signalling.