This is a glaringly bad faith interpretation of my post. You know what I meant - an op-ed featuring say a pro-pedophilia stance should not be published in a national media. This is not "discussion" or "public forum".
To clarify, i am not talking about pedophilia here, but other "obvious" things
> This is a glaringly bad faith interpretation of my post. You know what I meant - an op-ed featuring say a pro-pedophilia stance should not be published in a national media.
I'm really curious how you're distinguishing pro-pedophilia op-eds from pro-same-sex-marriage op-eds. Is it just that one is bad and one is good? How do you know which is which?
What other things should the government force a private company or that matter a citizen to say or not say?
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the rules from now on, we'd be grateful. I'm not banning your account because you fortunately haven't been using HN exclusively for political/ideological flames. But you're far on the wrong side of the "primarily" line: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....