You're saying no American city comes close to dense enough for there to be public toilets maintained?
I am curious what others think of the veracity of that statement, it leaves me scratching my head a bit. Agreed on the last sentence though.
I am curious what others think of the veracity of that statement, it leaves me scratching my head a bit. Agreed on the last sentence though.
Outside of the NE corridor of Boston-NYC-Philly-DC, I don't think any other major US city has the density for a high coverage public toilet network.
qualifier City of Boston and SF are fake cities. The real cities of Boston and SF extend far beyond their city boundaries which capture a tiny group of neighborhoods. The real city of Boston would also fail my criterion. Small cities like Portland, Maine do well-ish, but my focus is major cities.
Furthermore, even in American, geographically spread out, “driving cities”, there could still be public toilets people drive to.