I should write a SQL as a NoSQL database blog post, showing a trivial one-table schema that does all you could ever want in a NoSQL, especially after choosing to ignore that it still has SQL.
One of the larger relational DBs beating the OG NoSQL will always fill me with amusement.
1. Ed. looks like this is still the case, but please remember this is MongoDB specifically. AFAICT MongoDB is mostly a dead branch at this point and a comparison against Redis or something else that's had continued investment might be more fair. I'm just happy chilling in my SQL world - I'm not super up-to-date on the NoSQL market.
Also, here's SiSense sensationalizing it for easy digest: https://www.sisense.com/blog/postgres-vs-mongodb-for-storing...