Signal Just Made One Years Worth of Server Source Code Available in One Dump
linuxreviews.org
linuxreviews.org
> In order to offer an "ad-filled experience" and maximize our profits, LinuxReviews would very much like you to allow our Google AdSense ad-partner to use tracking and cookies so we can show ads from them on our website.
resist ALLOW
> forgot to update the GitHub repository
I don't think they "forgot". It was well discussed and people at signal were aware.
> That makes it look as if Signal has been pushing their code updates to git all along
It seems that someone doesn't really understand how software development on teams works if they thought that the whole team just "forgot" to commit their changes and no one noticed. It was expected to everyone I met that they were still using an internal repo.
I haven't checked the repo more thoroughly though. They really should give a public explanation; the idea they didn't this when multiple people have asked is not believable.
I like Signal. I want to like Signal. But I find myself making an increasing number of excuses for behavior inconsistent with their roots.
I wonder if there is enough energy out there to propel a thin-client fork.