> If kids don't get sick, then they don't get sick.
There's no data about prevalence of long-term symptoms after an infection yet, regardless of whether people show immediate symptoms.
There's no data about prevalence of long-term symptoms after an infection yet, regardless of whether people show immediate symptoms.
There's also no data about the prevalence of long-term symptoms of the covid vaccines, since it's literally impossible to test the 2-5 year effects of something that's only existed for one year, so by your logic should non-at-risk populations avoid taking that?
It's a complicated situation, and there's likely no perfect answer. However, it's definitely not as black-and-white as "if they don't get sick, they don't get sick", and such reductionist statements don't help make an informed decision.