StartSSL suspends services after a security breach
isc.sans.org
isc.sans.org
> Subscribers and holders of valid certificates are not affected in any form. Visitors to web sites and other parties relying on valid certificates are not affected.
In other words, if there are bogus certs out there, they will still work. (sigh)
The hackers behind the attack on StartCom failed to obtain any certificates that would allow them to spoof websites in a similar fashion, and they were also unsuccessful in generating an intermediate certificate that would allow them to act as their own certificate authority, Nigg said in an email
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/21/startssl_security_br...
Sounds like success story about a responsible operator with the information we have so far.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/21/startssl_security_br...
Hackers managed to somehow generate certificates for arbitrary domains. Looks like they spoke directly to Eddy Nigg (StartCom's CTO and COO) to get this info
The $500+ SSL rent-seekers, of course.
They didn't need to create fake Start certs or steal data - damaging Start's reputation may have been enough to liven up interest in the competition's wares.
Not that they haven't had their own problems: http://pastebin.com/74KXCaEZ