Verizon to end unlimited data option
money.cnn.com
money.cnn.com
That quote is disingenuous. The costs of maintaining their networks are not flying through the roof. The amount of people paying them a substantial monthly fee to use their data networks is what is flying through the roof.
The amount of extra money being spent on network upgrades is not keeping pace with the rise in revenue from smartphone data plans.
Yes, there is plenty of competition in the US wireless market. Which is why the remaining carriers are becoming more and more the same. This situation will only get worse when the FCC / DoJ inevitably approves the ATT/T-Mobile buyout.
What nonsense.
I also love the alarmist linked graphic at:
http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/08/technology/smartphone_data_u...
...which, if you believe their arbitrarily-guessed-at trendline, delivers the shocking news that by 2015, users might, on average...uh, still be downloading less than 2gig a month.
Label me entirely unconcerned with the carriers' ability to deal with this data "explosion". They just want to charge more. That's the only story here.
I think the author is conflating "exponential" with "really fast".
"No overages! (After 10 GB, data speeds are slowed until the next billing cycle)"
e.g. http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/cell-phone-plans-detail.a...
So there is not unlimited access at the highest network speeds, but the plan is nevertheless unlimited data -- as in you don't have to watch your consumption to avoid getting dinged with $$$/GB charges.
$25/month, unlimited data/text, no contract. Downsides are that you only get 300 voice minutes (can upgrade to 1200 for $40/mo), that it only uses the Sprint network (no roaming), and that they have a limited phone selection (although the LG Optimus V that I got seems pretty awesome so far). For me, and I would guess many others, the downsides pale in comparison to the benefits.
I've been recommending it to all my friends, and a few of them have started making the switch. Although one girl was opposed because she thought no-contract phones were for poor people.
<plug> And, if you are using one of their Android phones, you absolutely need my app for keeping track of remaining minutes and due dates. :)
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.jaygoel.virginminu... </plug>
I've been on T-Mobile for years, which has always just had a single data plan - $30-$35 a month for unlimited data and text messages. I thought this was a good deal, but once they started offering tiered data plans I immediately switched. I now get unlimited txts / 2GB of data for only $20 - almost half the original cost. My phone does Wifi - and almost everywhere I go has wifi - so I constantly use my phone on wifi and rarely consume data using my plan. The tiered plan saves me money.
I'd be perfectly fine with tiered if the prices were reasonable and, as you suggest, cheaper if you use less data. That doesn't seem to be the case in reality.
http://www.droid-life.com/2011/06/21/current-verizon-custome...
Customers currently under contract won't be affected by the changes, but new and renewing customers will likely have to accept the new, tiered plans.