My take is definitely different from GP: I find FreeBSD to have a much better documentation story compared to Linux (even Arch).
No, it's pretty broadly useful; I've used it on at least Ubuntu, Fedora, and centos. It helps that Arch is pretty close to upstream, so docs are usually pretty generic.
I can't disagree about offline docs and the extraordinary quality of BSD manpages, though:)
Admittedly, I can’t speak to how it compares to OpenBSD docs as I’ve never really bothered with OpenBSD
DragonflyBSD is cool, but documentation is rough and a lot of it seems to be from old FreeBSD components modified for its speciality. I will say the primary developer is an exceptionally nice person who’s helped me a time or two on the irc.
pacman -S arch-wiki-docs elinks
elinks /usr/share/doc/arch-wiki/html/en/Main_page.html> pacman -S arch-wiki-docs elinks
does pacman install docs and elinks without network?
interesting
This command downloads the packages without installing them:
pacman -Sw elinks arch-wiki-docs