Largest card grading service halts submissions
espn.com
espn.com
If it’s a legal/copyright issue, couldn’t you arrange to ‘rent’ this card for the duration of the game, or for inclusion in your deck from an owner / collector.
It seems ridiculous, as you mentioned, that playing the game is hampered, or not possible, due to the collectible nature of the playing cards.
However there is a gameplay advantage as well. The high price of cards keeps players more stable and invested in their decks. You don't see players constantly running whole new decks, and sometimes people get creative due to financial or card availability constraints.
I was a part of a weekly legacy group that ran with a house rule of 10 proxies allowed. This hit a nice compromise between people being able to play decent decks while still having some kind of stability in the local meta.
Because if you want it covered by your homeowner's or renter's insurance policy, you're going to need a rider on your policy for them, because homeowner's and renter's insurance policies tend to exclude valuable collectibles by default.
My M:tG collection isn't too crazy, but it does include 6 of the Power 9 (which I still play in decks), and my renter's insurance company has sent out an appraiser to verify the inventory so we could have a rider to cover it. They're worth as much as a pretty decent car.
The video games are getting to the point where they're probably next.
> But the [sports/trading/collectible] card boom had made the current growth unsustainable. PSA was receiving 500,000 cards every five days, which was more than the company took in every three months before the COVID-19 pandemic started. The number of packages received per month rose from under 18,000 this past November to nearly 30,000 in February, and it eventually caused the system to buckle. In its statement, PSA said the company had grown from 421 employees in January 2020 to 783 this March, still not nearly enough for the surge that has happened over the past 12 months.
There's too much capital chasing too few investment opportunities.
Someone mentioned "The Days of Perky Pat", by Phillip K. Dick, mostly known for "Blade Runner". I found and read that. It's relevant.
it's like the internet/social media is creating some mass hysteria FOMO in everything.
This bubble is going to pop with a devaluation of the dollar or a devaluation of everything else. But just because we are in a speculative mania does not mean that the price of assets is going to go down moving forward denominated in dollars. It is very possible the people shoving their money into baseball cards look like geniuses 5 years from now if the alternative was holding cash or having zero diversification.
I'm not sure where you get the idea that the dollar is suddenly going to lose a ton of value. People have been calling for this since the beginning of time, just like the people who keep trying to short the S&P 500. It's not gonna happen, certainly not any time soon.
If it did, however, assets would moon as literally anything other than cash is inflation-proof. Moon in units, but remain likely quite constant in value.
https://inflationchart.com/spx-in-m1
It basically shows the value of the S&P 500 as a function of total cash in the system.
So don't make it out to be some kind of fringe hypothesis to expect inflation. It's the base case at this point.
For the record I'm specifically not arguing we will have hyperinflation. I don't think we will. We don't even need to get within 1/10th of hyperinflation to inflate away our current stock market bubble or even the crypto bubble.
I don't think it's a fringe hypothesis, I just don't think it's a foregone conclusion by any stretch. I don't think the folks espousing the idea have any basis either.
> They are basically hockey sticking.
You're only looking at half the equation - inflation is a function of supply and velocity. The fed has tools to adjust the supply to match velocity and it has successfully done so for 50 years.
The high asset prices (and crypto prices) are IMO more a function of supply. That doesn't mean inflation. Inflation is measured against the CPI basket -- not against he S&P.
Simply having more supply doesn't imply inflation, or even 1/10th of hyperinflation. It just indicates the supply is high. When combined with measured inflation, it also implies the velocity is low. Were velocity to increase, the Fed can contract the supply by increasing the reserve limit, selling back bonds to unwind its balance sheet and raising interest rates.
Speaking of high asset prices, you might find this twitter thread suggesting that the Dutch tulip bubble was actually caused by an oversupply of currency [1].
[1] https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1382159296172015616?s=20
The popular wisdom regarding the tulip affair is widely acknowledged to be BS and it is played out regardless, So I'd recommend to pick a more interesting anecdote if you want to make a point regarding economics.
On the other hand I have absolutely no doubt that asset bubbles can be inflated by printing money and you are misunderstanding my point if you think I'm insinuating otherwise.
It was hard to find a loser in the past 2-4 years if all you did was buy boxes and sell them a year or two later. People are looking for anything that holds value to put their fiat in.
So is the value essentially zero?
Lots of trust. A good collector will glance through it and determine if it's something they want to take on. Those bulk sets are usually sold cheap enough that it's worth the risk.
I've sold a few sets and made clear each time that I'd an eBay seller and glanced through them but didn't have time to really dig in.
If you're just blinding buying lots online though you're gonna get screwed.
Individual packs will always be looked at with doubt, since they’ve probably been weighed and sorted.
Ironically they are making tokens fungible.