The Lone Coder
midrange.tedium.co
midrange.tedium.co
Some people accomplishes so much, they are a hard example to follow.
That's all I'll say before I get in trouble.
So I looked up the Raptor Talos II. It's a $7k (starting price) workstation running IBM Power9 RISC based CPUs which are typically used in super computers.
OOC why would someone want to use such a niche architecture for their primary workstation vs say an AMD Epyc or Intel equivalent?
POWER9 has some deployment in supercomputer clusters but its primary use is in IBM servers, basically the modern descendant of IBM minicomputers. These are purchased by businesses that want to run IBM i or AIX (or Linux).
Financially supporting a nascent open source hardware movement seems like a good thing.
https://libreboot.org/ https://coreboot.org/ https://boingboing.net/2012/01/10/lockdown.html
The asker has already decided what matters, what doesn't matter, and why.
The answer "Because X matters." is as meaningless as the question "Why does X matter when X doesn't matter?".
It's a thoughtless and effortless question that expects a thoughtful answer which is not effortless.
The answer is these three assertions which you will have to just accept as given. Your question exposes that you have either never taken 5 minutes to think about things like this, or have, and arrived at some other conclusion, and so would not make these assertions yourself. That explains why open source doesn't impact your product decisions. You asked why it impacts anyone's.:
1 - One doesn't need to do a thing personally to benefit from, or value the fact that a thing is possible, nor to appreciate the difference between possible (however difficult) and not-possible, nor the difference between natural and artificial difficulty or impossibility.
2 - It matters who ultimately controls ones possessions, and through them ones life.
3 - Ideals matter.
Clearly this is hobbiest for him in at lease some ways.
There are cheaper models, "down" to $4k, probably around $3k if you build it yourself; that's still expensive of course, but less :-)
(I wasn't able to read the linked article, so perhaps he indeed describes the version matching the price you quote, I don't know.)
Supporting owner-controlled computing was one point, but I also really like toying around with exotic systems, especially if they've got UNIX heritage :)
Now that takes me back to an early web. I kinda like it. I got more content from scanning one screens-worth of that page than the actual Google news.
> If you aren’t paying for the software, then please don’t be a jerk. There is a human at the other end of those complaints and unless you have a support contract, that person owes you exactly nothing. Whining is exhausting to read and “doesn’t work” reports are unavoidably depressing, disparaging or jokey comments are unkind, and making reports nastier or more insistent doesn’t make your request more important. This is true whether or not your request is reasonable or achievable, but it’s certainly more so when it isn’t.
> As kindly as I can put it, not all bug reports are welcome.
> And that puts undue pressure on the one guy who is pushing this specific platform forward on what is arguably its most important tool. (On top of all of this Kaiser, a medical doctor and infectious diseases expert, [...] during a pandemic, [...] who briefly hinted at this in his TenFourFox post, literally was the person who called off Coachella this year.)
So in addition to maintaining a fork of Firefox he averts an explosion of COVID-19 cases from Coachella in his day job.
http://web.archive.org/web/20210418161124/https://midrange.t...
Personally I don't understand why people spend any amount of energy supporting abandoned proprietary closed source platforms.