Or are you going to fix Silverlight? Oh, you already did? Umm... well, then I guess we better get around to fixing our browsers, rather than putting our feet in our mouths.
Or are you going to fix Silverlight? Oh, you already did? Umm... well, then I guess we better get around to fixing our browsers, rather than putting our feet in our mouths.
You typically don't rush out fixes for beta
versions of products
You can find fixes of open-source projects as soon as they are committed.Microsoft made a bold claim, people are curious about how they fixed Silverlight if indeed they did that. If not a new Silverlight release, than at least write some kind of blog post explaining what's different in Silverlight.
But I'd bet this is typical of Microsoft; right hand, meet left hand, please communicate :)
That might be relevant if it wasn't for the fact that Silverlight is not open source. They are under no obligation to show/blog their fix until they actually release. In fact, they would probably want to withhold it as long as possible if their intent is to damage WebGL.
Chrome does. Every time Ubuntu checks for updates (weekly or more often), there's a new version of Chrome dev channel available.