Not relevant. The US Army Corp & DNR studied this in the 50s and 60s. It’s not feasible to get water from the Columbia, eel, or Klamath rivers to central or Southern California. As parent mentioned there are too many mountain ranges in the way and nuclear tunneling didn’t even pass muster then. Why would the US go to BC when it already flows in to WA & OR, and is still too isolated from CA populations?
You miss the point. Take over Canada and make it part of the US. Move the people, not the water.
People could already move to wetter parts of the U.S. if that's what they want. Vermont and Maine are plenty wet and have small populations.
So does Canada, and there's a lot more room there than in Vermont.
Don't tell Suncor or Alberta. They'll be happy to build you a pipeline anywhere.
The point is Canada's water is not close enough to the places in the USA that would need that water for it be compelling to invade Canada for their water.
Sure it is, when Canada becomes part of the US and people who live where the water isn't just get to move there.
If this line of comments is a sarcastic joke then you need to make it a bit more obvious.