The study also found a corresponding 9% drop in public transport ridership.
The study also found a corresponding 9% drop in public transport ridership.
And of course with Uber Pool and Lyft Line, there may be only a slight detour for pickups.
This situation seems better than taxis, which drive an empty car around when they're NOT EVEN on their way to pick someone up. They'll just drive around and around waiting for someone to stick their arm out.
"due to the substantial deadheading miles (miles travelled without a passenger), which account for at least 40.8% of TNC miles"
However, I can see how many people may take several " to work it out.
This is true, but mainly for dense cities prior to Uber/Lyft, and even then cabs driving looking for fares would be in the central part of the city. Here in NYC back in the day I’d rarely find a cab just driving around in Brooklyn, you’d typically find them on main roads driving back to Manhattan after dropping off their last fare if you did.
Now there are just a lot more for hire vehicles driving around the city in general. There was an artificial shortage of medallions, with about 14000 of them back before the apps, plus a bunch of for hire car services (and dollar vans on Flatbush). Now there’s about 100,000 cars for hire in NYC.
Also, in many jurisdictions, capacity for taxis is limited; that's what the medallions are for. Ride-sharing capacity is not limited.
I haven't seen data on whether taxis or ride-sharing have more spare capacity in terms of miles, but I have seen data that ride-sharing vehicles significantly increase traffic.
None of those things are very problematic on very small scales...an inconvenience at most. But just a tad more than that, and it can create absolute chaos.
Uber could optimize this by predicting where demand will be and telling a subset of drivers to move there. Right now drivers predict and move to hotspots in herds.