Found a link with a meaningful type sample for each of the new possibilities: https://www.thurrott.com/cloud/microsoft-365/249574/microsof...
I think skeeva is the most unobtrusive of the bunch if that’s what we’re going for, and grandview would be my choice for its no nonsense legibility. I know I’ll be looking at this font for many years so let’s pick something that is easiest on the reader while still being professional. I actually think calibri was a step back from Arial despite some of the improvements because it lost a professional look. Tenorite looks like it has that same casual look.
The most obvious difference would be the shapes of 'a', 'l', 'g'. Then there are finer details, like whether the circles in the letters are fully round (see Tenorite), a bit oval-lish, or consist of vertical lines capped by upper and lower curves (Grandview is the more extreme example of this). Also how a circle are attached to a line, in case of 'b', 'p', 'q' etc. whether it joins with the short end (Seaford's 'b' and 'q' looks joined) or left hanging.
And then of course, there's kerning i.e. how the letters are spaced. Some try to make the spacing consistent, others aim for balance when stringed together as a word.
Personally I'd have chosen Bierstadt for its choice of a/l/g, although I don't like its kerning between c and k.