> ... it feels like a get rich quick scheme for its founders
Well, Bitcoin itself is a get rich quick scheme for its founders. So are most of its spinoffs.
Well, Bitcoin itself is a get rich quick scheme for its founders. So are most of its spinoffs.
Regardless of what you think about Bitcoin, this claim is completely ahistorical.
I wouldn't call it a get rich quick scheme for its founder(s) because I doubt they could have known it would take off the way it did.
But, at this point, I don't know that intent matters. Imagine if Bitcoin really did become a dominant currency... one guy would own 5% of it, a deflationary currency! The "fiat billionaires" don't come anywhere close to that kind of concentration of wealth.