This bill would've sounded way more principled if it didn't have:

>The bill includes a clause that exempts a company "that owns and operates a theme park or entertainment complex" - which allows Disney to be exempt from this bill

With this and:

>"If Facebook buys a theme park, does that prevent us from being able to regulate what happens on Facebook?" asked Andrew Learned a Democratic member of Florida's House of Representatives.

>"So, if they bought a theme park and named it Zuckerland and he met the definition of a theme park under Florida statute, then yes," said Republican Representative Blaise Ingoglia.

I just can't take it seriously. It just reeks "rule for thee, not for mee" and crony politician doing their own thing.

Edit: I would totally go to Zuckerland, though.