Hacker News Reader

Should this be rather "American Police Kill too Many people"? Or maybe even "American Police Kill too many Innocent people".

Also, what would be the right amount of innocent people for the police to kill?

Edit: I reacted instinctively without thinking it through. I agree with the comments below that the word ‘innocent’ should have nothing to do with it.

View on HN

The [dangerous] implication behind saying "[...] Police Kill too many Innocent people" is that police have a right to kill criminals, which is not true. Whether or not you are innocent, police still don't have a right (and shouldn't) kill you, so I personally am rejecting your re-interpretation of the title.

Police are responsible for for apprehending the criminals and only are supposed to use deadly force in self-defense or in protecting other people.

That’s a good point that did not occur to me, and I agree!

I rather liked the meme that police shouldn't kill guilty people either.

So, the ideal number is clearly zero. Just the same as the ideal number of people to die in car crashes. Yes, you can acknowledge that zero is likely not going to get attained. No, you don't give up and argue over the number as a distraction.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com