Humanity Does Not Need Bill Gates
currentaffairs.org
currentaffairs.org
This is the essential truth about Gates and Microsoft. Microsoft did not advance computing; it suffocated it and made it into a grey, boring, feudal kingdom, at least through the 90s, driven by Gates ruthless mindset of monopolisation and 'embrace, extend, extinguish'. And even now we still have to pay the 'Microsoft tax' on every personal computer we buy, even if, like many here on HN do, we immediately replace Windows with a Free Software operating system (usually some variant of GNU/Linux).
Whatever the argument about Gates' philanthropy (and personally, I remain highly sceptical around that) it can't be denied that the way he made his money made the world poorer, to his personal profit.
This is a man who, instead of sitting on his wealth goes out there and dedicates his remaining years to doing as much good in the world as possible.
You bring up "paying off journalists" but the article doesn't even mention that. Instead, he donates money to newspapers so they can cover underappreciated topics like global povert. Ohhh noooo Bill Gates donates money to the Guardian so they can have a "Global Development" website, those MONSTERS!!![0] Here's their DEPLORABLE description: "This website is funded by support provided, in part, by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The journalism and other content is editorially independent and its purpose is to focus on global development...The Guardian’s award-winning global development site was launched in 2010 to provide special focus on the millennium development goals — the eight targets set in 2000 by the United Nations Millennium Declaration with the aim of improving the lives of the world’s poorest people by 2015. The site has gone on to produce news, features, debate, multi-media and photography from journalists, experts and people around the world."[1]
You bring up that the foundation "controls pharmaceutical patents" but tbh it's an specious (and unsourced) claim from KHN that reeks of conspiracy theory vibes. If that's what you call a rock solid source then I have bridge to sell you.
That last point is fascinating because there you're twisting something great -- working to bring mobile banking to the impoverished rural communities of Tanzania -- into something that's somehow awful. Mobile banking is such an incredibly impactful way to reduce poverty[2] yet he's the DEVIL for partnering with a for-profit company?
Grow up and get a life.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/global-development
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2010/sep/14/a...