Why Google Plus won’t hurt Facebook, but Skype will hate it
gigaom.com
gigaom.com
That's not a reason, that's just an assertion backed up with an assertion.
> I don’t feel quite compelled to switch from Facebook or Twitter to Google
Well, neither do I, but I'm sure as shit going to try it, and make my friends try it too - and then I'll make an informed decision. And anyway, there's not necessarily any reason I'll need to stop using FB or Twitter - maybe I'll use all three, which would still be a win for Google.
Don't they realize their greatest hits have always been dull names: Google Mail, Google Chat, Google Apps, Google Search. OTOH their failures were just as flamboyant: Buzz, Wave, Knol... Is that the work of some expensive branding consultants?
But I hope Google+ catches on. FB needs some competitive pressure to start getting their act straight.
https://www.google.com/intl/en-GB/+/learnmore/notifyme.html
A bit strange to see a rookie mistake like that from Google, given the fanfare over this thing.
I have a bad feeling this is going to be like Wave - those people who do get invites have nobody to talk to so by the time everyone else gets invited the interest has peaked.
I really hope not, though. Facebook seriously need competition.
That's not much of a reason.
Step 1: G+ is integrated into Google Apps for Business. Every business account is tied to a G+ account.
Step 2: Departments use it for communication. The CEO uses it for top-down communication. It's no more or no less secure than email as it is, but it gives a better way to manage what was once email groups.
Step 3: Instead of maintaining a Skype address book and an email address book, it's all bundled into one. Conference calls are simple to manage, and how far away is screen sharing and presentation features?
G+ could, if Google were inclined, become a Skype killer, and a Lotus Notes killer, and finally become an Outlook killer.
Now, I'm not saying that Google has the vision, or that Google has it in their DNA, but it is possible.