I think it's foolish to think we have things 'right' now.

In 1967, I'm pretty certain the engineers responsible thought they had it everything in order.

I take the view we will always fuck up.

With nuclear, the fuck up will always have larger, longer lasting consequences.

--

Edit:

> Nuclear is demonstrably cleaner, safer, lower risk, and potentially lower cost (although how do you price the cost of destroying the planet right?) than any other baseload technology.

I'd agree it's cleaner if we didn't have the waste problem.

You're making a false equivalence. It's not a case of nuclear or fosil fuels. We have other options.