I just open sourced my music collaboration site
github.com
github.com
Like its really hard to, say, change the drum pattern on a track if you dont have access to the underlying files that were used to produce it.
But please don't cave in to the trend and don't introduce NFTs...
Edit: Added an example for the rights.
NFT is just built on the artificial market for rarity and currencies made of pure energy use... useless.
> If you want to authentify an artistic piece, you can just sign it with a private asymmetric key.
Isn't this exactly what NFT-artwork is though? The difference is that the signature is now in a publicly accessible space, like the ethereum blockchain rather than an email. And you now have the option of selling that artwork forward because, unlike an emailed and signed piece of art, there is only a single NFT.
> NFT is just built on the artificial market for rarity and currencies made of pure energy use... useless.
Every time I've tried to address comments like these, the conversation is less-than-constructive. I'm not sure if it's the backfire effect coming into play, or if there's something wrong with the way I'm presenting my information. Regardless, despite my best efforts it ends the other person saying things like "beanie babies", "cult", or "I don't care", and so I've just stopped trying.
Https certificates and PGP signatures are some examples perfectly fine without requiring the whole world to make bazillions of hash calculations on your block.
One aim of digitalization is to get data that is perfectly transferable and copiable.
Now if you want to artificially and needlessly make the copying cost some megajoules of energy, you will undergo the anger of people with a common sense an ecological sensitivity.
The whole concept of paying to get copies of music/art/whatever is broken, and to ”fix“ it we are bending the very laws of nature. Until recently it was still quite harmless, even the DRM you can live with, but now you need to prove you performed the combustion of tons of CO2 to become owner of a digital copy? To keep enforcing the unenforceable we are committing planet-scale suicide.
No, the real way to go, is the one of Patreon etc, where you pay to help succeed artistic endeavours.
For transferablity, you can use the public key of a marketplace instead of the author's public key, so that the marketplace can take back the artwork (and reimburse you) and sell it again to somebody else with their new name embedded instead.
See? I can do all of that just with asymmetric ciphers.
1) Put some info on your homepage about what this actually does. When I first landed I wasn't sure what the purpose of the website was. 2) Resize your images! For example your header logo is massive and took a good 5+ seconds to download. You have a max-width of 994px, but the image itself is a whopping 14,976px wide!
I'd like to be able to sort by 'liked' and by 'baked'. If I'm looking for a new track to collaborate on I want to see the ones with the fewest 'baked' ratings.
Also, I'd love for there to be a way to see the full lineage of a given track. Perhaps even be able to fork it if, e.g., I liked what contributors 1, 2 and 3 did, but not #4, I could work off of #3's rendition.