It doesn't. It says it is well suited for GoL, but not for slightly different problems.
This is surely true, but I think as criticism it misses the mark because nobody seeing a problem of similar complexity to GoL should say "I know! Let's write a one-liner in APL!" The fact that it's possible at all is what is impressive.
It's a little like if someone wrote a post criticising Ruby on Rails by writing a game engine in it, and then pointing out that it's slow.