Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

mkoryak

thats too enterprisey, at a startup you would write it like this:

const charA = (false+"")[1];

View on HN

That has three constants.

is this better?

const charA = (![]+[])[+!+[]];

[] is still a constant.

True, but we can both agree that this is a better constant than "a". Much better job security in that code.. unless you get fired for writing it, that is

I cannot even parse this. What is going on here?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com