Good point that StGit's docs could benefit from a compare/contrast with interactive rebase workflows. Thanks!

> slightly nicer interface to interactive rebase

More accurate to say StGit is an alternative interface that does some of the same things as interactive rebase (and more). For me, part of StGit's value proposition is that it is not interactive. A single imperative StGit command may accomplish as much as an interactive rebase session.

Workflows using `git rebase --autosquash` feel more similar to StGit because of their non-interactivity.

Describing a patch queue development workflow as a "slightly nicer interface to interactive rebase" does it a tremendous disservice. It's like saying "a database is a slightly nicer interface to a filesystem" — technically true, but a disservice.