You're ignoring my point. I can group religions together, it's not fallacy. You obviously don't understand what a fallacy is. I'm just grouping based on a common trait, to make an over-arching point.

> We don't claim that we know everything in Islam

Did I say this? Who said religions claim to know everything? Not me.

> Once he accepts them (and subsequently accepts Islam), it doesn't make sense to doubt them once more does it?

You are dancing around my point. "Once he accepts them" = not doubting.

Please read my arguments carefully. They are subtle, and it seems you think I am attacking religion, when I'm not.

> My point is that the false dichotomy that some people try to claim between "science and religion" totally depends on which religion is being discussed.

My argument does not depend on a specific religion, they all share things in common. If you deny that they all share SOME things in common, then I don't know what to tell you. Why are they called "religions" if they are so different? Why do they share the same label since before both of us were born.