Saving the physical versions is preservation of cultural history. The information content should definitely be digitized.
Singletons are probably not enough. But why save the physical aspects? Why not simply digitize people discussing it, take pictures of the original form, etc.? Why invest the time and energy maintaining items of dubious future need?
Newspapers were meant to be disposable, then and now, its good to store the information, but I'm highly skeptical of the need to hold onto the physical copies after scanning.
We should not be hoarders. There is a balance to be struck.
I recommend considering folks can be multifaceted and aren't solely bound to one's opposing opinion as they read down a comment chain.
Good day.
(whit everything I also include WalMart depliants)