BTW, it's off-topic, but this right here is the among best arguments we can make for strong privacy, and against mass surveillance. If people are willing to swallow monetary damage out of fear to upset an algorithm that may cut back their privileges, imagine what happens to political free speech when you have to fear govt surveillance and black vans.
The only error I can recall from Amazon is they once included an exacto knife I didn't order in a package to me.
If same thing kept happening inside non-online business I think we would find it pretty okay...
You keep finding the food you're buying is mouldy so you complain/return it.
They ban you.
So, now you need to spend significantly more money and time on petrol and driving in order to do you weekly shop.
That's OK?
On other side, let's say customer violently attacks other customers or staff. Or causes substantial property damage intentionally, maybe attempts arson. Would you still disagree with them banning such customer?