Why would that be good?
Why would that be good?
Like the old saying goes: Step 1 is admitting you have a problem. The author didn't quite go that far. But they gave enough of an idea of what's going on in their head that someone else can start to diagnose it.
"Sometimes" is the key word here. And the one that I wouldn't know how to quantify.
Ostracization is a valid social regulation for enforcing certain qualities in a society and it's not always wrong to use it.
Ostracism is shown to be a precursor to terroristic ideation, if your goal is to see less mass shootings and similar extreme events we would all be better served to consider rehabilitative and inclusionary practices instead of punishing people that you deem too soft or ostracizing t them.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323393438_Ostracism...
There are two ways to resolve that - change your mental behavior/personality and change the expectations upon you - and there's nothing in the definition to prefer one over the other.