I really do think the court has opened Pandora's box on this one. They should've voided the statute for vagueness if that was the concern. As it stands now, it has to be one of the dumbest laws on the books.
I really do think the court has opened Pandora's box on this one. They should've voided the statute for vagueness if that was the concern. As it stands now, it has to be one of the dumbest laws on the books.
This is prosecutable under a myriad of existing laws. CFAA was specifically crafted to deter and punish hacking. As far as I know, that's still very much a thing.
Yes it is, theft of trade secrets [1].
[1] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-dow-research-scientist...
It's still illegal to steal IP. But no, you can't charge a janitor with keys to the whole building for breaking and entering if he uses those keys to steal something.
You charge him for theft.
I strongly disagree with your assessment (re: Pandora's box, dumbness), but I do think and acknowledge it is a law worthy of being replaced with one more up to date and more clear.
It prevents a whole bunch of other sophisticated attacks as well, but let's be honest, people just giving out their password or using a really weak password is the most likely scenario.