What does that even mean? I've pretty much gotten away with using JS for just about everything for the last 4 years. The evolution of a language to make it compete with other languages isn't necessarily "shoehorning". Am I not a true developer because I like JS and haven't found a need to write code in something like Rust?

EDIT: Do you mean that it lacks certain features without a runtime like Node or the browser? For instance, it doesn't have a language construct for opening files like Python or Ruby. If so, I don't think that's a good argument.

I would say it is. It didn't start as one but over the decades it sure has become a general purpose language.

I can't find a domain where JS wouldn't fit the description. While it may be a bad fit for certain problems, it can still be done.

JS is incredibly versatile, though I would agree that that's mostly JavaScript being equally bad in nearly every domain :)

I wonder how much of the horizontal scaling trend is driven by JavaScript's horrible threading story.

You might be confusing the JavaScript programming language and the browser runtime.

The former is a general purpose programing language that favors prototypical object oriented programing paradigm but supports multiple other paradigms such as imperative and functional.

The latter uses the JavaScript language and adds on a bunch of specific APIs (such as the DOM) for specific purposes. This includes APIs for DOM manipulation, playing audio, validating inputs, parsing forms, handling key presses, etc.

I'd be curious to hear some examples where JS doesn't fit as a general purpose language. In my arrogance I suspect it would be hard to give examples that don't also disqualify other scripting langs like python and ruby. Perhaps you don't consider those to be general purpose either?

Yes I mean JS with node