I wonder what the ceaseless appeal of stories like this is. They seem to pop up a LOT.
That narrative is usually an easy ticket to the front page of HN.
> After filing the second police report, an officer told her he would have to keep the computer as > evidence, and take prints that Nahwegahbow worried would wipe the computer contents. She > grabbed the computer from his arms and told him "You can't have it. It's mine. I just got it > back!" She got to keep it.
At least they saw reason and let her hold on to it!
It's quite interesting how if you looked at this bureaucratic system from the perspective of a program or a website, you can't help but think of ways to solve the problem in the way any new start-up would; the system is outdated for today's world--and despite that no one dares tackle any of these issues as to not rock the boat or create a system without ample time off for some sweet vacations.I'm not arguing the case either way, just suggesting that such stories are often interpreted through the filter of our existing bias.
As for filters - I admire the woman in the story, because she is a great example of the entrepreneurial mindset.
1: Attempt to achieve your goal by conventional means (call police).
2: Actually notice that conventional means will not get you what you want.
3: Come up with an alternate plan (DIY sting operation).
4: Execute fearlessly.
I argue that those four steps, broadly, are what a good startup founder does.
She probably risked her life more by driving to the Starbucks than she did confronting the thief in a busy public location in one of the safest cities in the world. Turn off your TV and get outside.
Note as well, a person acting quickly can out-shine the "professional" crime-solvers quite easily; another part of the appeal of such stories.