These figures are meaningless without also stating what % of income the top x% earned. for example if the top 1% earned 99% of all income then paying 24% of all tax doesn't look so good.
By considering income but not wealth as taxable, the system skews automatically to highly regressive, furthering wealth inequality.
No they are not. But those numbers are also in the link, and it is more or less the same, top 1% earned 20.9% of all income.
Here is another view on the mess of income inequality in the US (with Europe for comparison): https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjRkWPeU8AIeWtG?format=jpg&name=...
Indefensible really. Digging your own grave.
Again, this is in the source I linked, and if by similar you mean, differing by 14.4%, then sure.