Unrelated, but again I wish the science community would put the "conclusion" heading right after the "abstract". It's what everyone jumps to, and it would probably even enable more consumption by the lay public. You only read the body of the paper after reading the conclusion anyway.
"Our results show that a pit was dug in a sterile sediment layer and the corpse of a two-year-old child was laid there."
If the lay-public cannot follow the linear steps and context of research, then how will they understand the conclusion? It would be no better than an authoritative appeal. "I called this research and formatted it like so, nevermind the methods or data, therefore you should accept this conclusion" is about as far from the intent of science as one gets.