Hacker News Reader

This study backs up the claim that people who had it don't need to get vaccinated. If it gets widely reported, that probably means fewer people will get vaccinated.

So let me ask you this, what's the worst case scenario if they're right but had waited 6 months to get it reviewed? Then consider, what's the worst case scenario if they're wrong?

View on HN

> If it gets widely reported, that probably means fewer people will get vaccinated.

So.. no change? At least in the US, we're already at the point where we have more vaccines than people who want them.

Good way to weigh things

I say this about every study

My main point is that it likely wont get peer reviewed, ever, unless it goes viral and people ask questions

Reply on news.ycombinator.com