Hacker News Reader

Efficiency is for robots. I deliver value to my company on a continuous basis and if taking a nap in the afternoon means I work an hour or two in the evening then I don't see what worries The Economist should hold about the situation.

View on HN

I don't see what worries The Economist should hold about the situation

The readership of the Economist is worried about commercial real estate.

That is my takeaway also - the editorial staff at The Economist must have friends in commercial real estate.

It's convenient that Economist articles don't show bylines. They claim that it's because they want to speak with a collective voice, but it also makes it impossible to point out specific conflicts of interest. The latter seems more important than the former, in my eyes.

> I deliver value to my company on a continuous basis and if taking a nap in the afternoon means I work an hour or two in the evening

But this sounds efficient.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com