Hacker News Reader

Comment by missedthecue | Hacker News Reader

The accredited investor rules irk me. Not because investing in startups is a good way to accumulate wealth, but because of the double standard. The government happily separates literally tens of billions of dollars from poor people every year through the lottery, why can't we let those people crowdfund interesting new ideas if they want to?

View on HN

Blame scam artists. Before these rules were in place, scammers were taking people's life savings through shoddy investments. This happened often enough that people asked the government to step in to protect these people. And the "Accredited Investor" was born.

Maybe things would be better today if they revoked the rules. Or maybe they would be worse. But either way it exists for a reason.

And to be honest, $1MM is not a huge hurdle to overcome. Anyone looking to invest in risky ventures would be wise to accumulate a meaningful amount of wealth in order to shield them from the loss of capital they will very likely incur. Plus, there are ways around this in certain situations.

A better approach would be to address the reporting requirements that are preventing startups from going public earlier. Startups used to IPO a few years after founding, but now they are going for 10+years.

Fortunately, you can now also become an accredited investor by taking a class rather than meeting income or wealth requirements.

This is the right approach IMO.

Do you have any info on where to take this class?

Unfortunately, I don't. Here is more about it though: https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-reso...

I also have seen that some Angel Investment firms will pay cost of accreditation from your fees to them.

There is a secondary benefit in that it influenced people like me to save, invest, and work very very hard to get that status. I invested in one YC startup after achieving it and that felt like a major personal win.

However, the financial goal posts were set 20+ years ago should have been periodically updated for inflation.

Due to the long history of investment scams. The lottery takes large sums in aggregate, but doesn’t use high pressure sales tactics or let people easily place their life savings in it. Aka, it would take significant effort to buy 500,000$ worth of lottery tickets.

The lottery gives players a moment to fantasize about what it’d be like to be rich. I see no difference to buying a beer for a few moments of entertainment.

Obviously people can overdo gambling, but the same goes for beer.

Look at the SPAC boom. Letting retail in creates many problems. There are too many scam artists in the world.

Thanks to Regulation Crowdfunding, people can. Sites like Wefunder make it easy to do so.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com