Crazy Clock
tindie.com
tindie.com
I did an art project back in 2016 with a $2 IKEA clock with a Raspberry Pi and a camera. I used OpenCV to detect when someone was looking at the clock, and when that happened the hands would stop moving, freezing. When the person looked away the clock would tick at a faster race, until it caught up with the right time. One of my favorite projects!
Here you can find everything you need: https://www.cibomahto.com/2008/03/controlling-a-clock-with-a...
I'm thinking "teacher mode" that goes fast for the first 45 "mins" of the hour then slows incrementally so the last 5 "mins" takes 15 minutes to pass! Evil.
The second hand runs slightly faster for the first 59 seconds, then freezes for one second and then ticks together with a minute hand.
Looks like this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJwPOBoy3V8
I was considering getting one, but apparently there are (were?) some production quality issues, so in the end decided against it.
The link to such a classic piece of industrial design is very pleasing. Confirmed rumour has it that entrance to a popular design museum in a prominent world city is free to anyone visibly wearing one.
The movement is electronically adjustable to precisely align the second hand and minute hand positions to exactly the right spot.
German railways use the same system as the Swiss ones, so be sure to wear it if you travel to the continent.
One friend of mine took the class as a senior.
At Caltech then there were two math classes, AMa 95 and Ma 108, that were generally taken in your junior year, and were either prerequisites to or had to be taken simultaneously with nearly every junior and senior class in your major. AMa 95 for engineering and physical science majors, Ma 108 for math majors. These were both a noticeable step up in difficulty compared to the two prior years of math, and if you saw a junior who was tired and in a daze it was probably due to 95 or 108.
My friend took Ma 108.
108 had a way of then haunting you even after you got through it. You'd start noticing that number all over the place. You'd need to go to some office, and it would be room 108. You look at your watch after a leisurely lunch to see if it is time to get back to work, and it is 1:08 pm.
My friend had had enough of that, so when she built her digital clock she made it so it held 1:07 for two minutes and then went straight to 1:09.
In normal operation each clock is stepped forward by a DC pulse each minute, but in the last minute any slow clocks are driven by multiple rapid reverse polarity pulses, which align the hands to the 12:00 o'clock position.
This means that the hands of most clocks smoothly step forward, but any incorrect clocks will catch up by suddenly racing to the 12:00 o'clock position once each hour.
I was envisioning a clock where the second hand dragged the others every time it passed over. So the minute hand would only move when swept over by the minute hand, for as far as it needed to revolve. Similarly, the hour hand.
I would be nice if the minute hand moved the hour hand, but that would be noticeably inaccurate.
I have been wanting this for years. Wish I could do it to my watch.
(once they're back in stock)
I synthesize a little martian electrical grid: HP5071a atomic clock --10MHz--> HP3325a --58.394657765 Hz--> HP6827a bipolar amplifier --~100vac--> clock.
Plus side I can have as many sync motor mars clocks as I want and it's only using random gear I had laying around, downside is that it's not very energy efficient, perhaps about 150W. :P
I’m not familiar with electronics or hardware programming.
It's a little bit reminiscent of how people figured out that you could use cheap USB TV tuners as software-defined radios, although obviously this project is a lot simpler than that.
An arhythmic clock which looks like broken, but keeping the time correct is interesting in many fronts. First, it looks broken, but it's not. Second, if the movement is a bit noisy, monotonous tick-rocks will become irregular, hence interesting for our brain.
In other ways, it's delightfully non-conventional, but working as intended at the end. As a result of this, it's kinda delicious as it's interesting. That's a good combination.
Lastly, all of this is packaged as a de-facto standard wall/desk clock movement. Consider if you change your meeting room's big wall clock to this. Lazy, Whacky or Tuney would be fun. Very fun.
Probably more likely a lack of sync in my brain (I have very little sense of rhythm).
What I would love is a clock with a consistent sound, mine makes a slightly different tick for some odd positions and that bugs me.
Dinner room at my Moms home has like 6 different ticking clocks, some more than 100 years old. It absolutely kills me everytime.
TL;DR:
> Novelty clocks:
>
> Whacky clock - ticks once a second, but on a random tenth-of-a-second, so it's arhythmic.
> Wavy clock - tick frequency is proportional to a sine wave. Sort of looks like it's "surging."
> Lazy clock - picks a random interval and then ticks that number of seconds very quickly and then just stops.
> Crazy clock - runs at three different speeds - slow, normal or fast. Much more subtle than it sounds.
> Vetinari clock - runs slightly slow, but adds a periodic "stutter" tick to make up for it.
> Warpy clock - runs 10% fast for 12 hours, then 10% slow for 12 hours. Makes the days just fly by.
> Early clock - keeps time anywhere between 0 and 10 minutes fast. For those who like to set their watch ahead to avoid being late. This clock keeps you from trying to "compensate," because you never know how early it is at the moment.
> Tuney clock - ticks normally most of the time, but occasionally will tick out "songs," like shave-and-a-haircut, or SOS in morse...
It may be obvious, but I missed it - do I buy one kit, but then I can load all these firmwares, or is the goal to have me buy one kit per novelty?
In more subtle mode the clock just works normally. The crazy part is the shared delusion of time. Subtle isn't it?
I love these kinds of playful projects - feels like the core of 'hacker spirit'.
[0]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdnXLv5za-k
At one time I had a backwards clock [1]. It turns out it was the only analog clock in the house so after a while I got used to it. Then I would be jolted back to reality when going outside and seeing a "normal clock.
[1]. https://www.walmart.com/ip/9-quot-BACKWARDS-CLOCK/35002444
And how about these one-handed watches [2]. Ostensibly, they "fundamentally change the way you look at your watch and ... give you a much better consciousness about the progression of your day". True? After my experience with the backwards clock, I'd like to find out. But I don't want to buy an expensive watch, I'd rather make my own one-handed clock.
[2]. https://www.slow-watches.com/24-hour-one-hand-watch/
edits: fixed link and typos
(*) The tolerance clock always displays time that is within some tolerance of true time, but that is all it guarantees. I never worked out formal specs, so either crazy clock or early clock would suffice I think.
neat!
https://www.klockit.com/all-departments/quartz-clock-movemen...
I am replacing all the movements in my house with this. Ticking clocks are the bane of my existence.
You have very limited opportunities to "crazy up" those style of movements, as the coil can only be stepped so quickly.
Some people just want to watch the world burn.
1. You can't make it go the opposite direction. 2. You can't change the gearing ratio between the hands. 3. You can't know where the hands are actually pointing.
What you're left with is the ability to alter the timing of the second hand and everything else falls out from that.
Getting a reply from (presumably) the source is what I love about HN.
I was going to buy one for the ability to fast forward time as a trick (which is just how it sets itself, no tricks) the Echo Clock is so close to electronic junk, while also so close to useful.
But I did wonder if children would consider a clocks flow as immutable as older, pre cellphone generations.
This is a cool project. And it'll be interesting to see how future generations see time.
My project is similar in a way that you have to manually drive this motor, idea is to convert existing 12-hour clock to 'week' 168-hour clock. Hour hand would make full rotation only each 168 hours, showing current day of the week and approximate part of the day.
Very cool project to tinker with electronics and gears, you have to figure out timing(30ms energize, 970ms rest, repeat in reverse polarity) and how to drive motor(use half-bridge circuit or motor driver)[3], you have to deal with inductive 'kick' flyback voltage spikes and protect IC from it[4], and figure out mechanical gears[5] (typical quartz mechanism[6])
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavet-type_stepping_motor
[1.1] https://resonanceswavesandfields.blogspot.com/2011/03/unders...
[1.2] https://resonanceswavesandfields.blogspot.com/2011/03/unders...
[1.3] http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/quartz.htm
[1.4] https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/archives/2016/04/clockwor...
[1.5] https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/archives/2016/03/clockwor...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartz_clock
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-bridge
[3.1] https://www.microtype.io/h-bridge-circuit-design/
[3.2] http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jones/step/circuits.html
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyback_diode
[4.1] https://pdfserv.maximintegrated.com/en/an/AN6307.pdf
[4.2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snubber
[5] https://ciechanow.ski/gears/
[6] https://geargenerator.com/#68.75,675,25,30,1,3,513926.199999...