Hacker News Reader

Comment by 867-5309 | Hacker News Reader

I'd imagine hosting would not be resource-heavy so <$2/mo, that's why sites like these don't really need ads as the cost of hosting is negligible. is there any way of generating revenue other than plastering a load of ads onto a website? because doing so would cost a great number of users

View on HN

I would assume they would be inexpensive to host as well. That's a given. I'm more interested in how much money they can make.

Simply running ads doesn't really seem like an issue as long as you're not making the site unusable. I'd be more concerned about the fact that the average user in need of a base64 converter is arguably more likely to be using an adblocker.

those on the first page of search engine results are more likely to command a higher price. I wonder how much time it would take to reconcile the investment with ads, and likely a reduced userbase. probably years

> because doing so would cost a great number of users

Would it? Like, Google isn’t going to boot you for running AdSense on your site.

I’m guessing the money is made off search engine visitors rather than recurring visitors that would figure out how to do it by command line.

I meant visitors would be deterred by the sudden infestation of ads, not that page ranking would decrease. if anything it would probably increase

also, how would a search engine visit make money?

Most Sites shows ads through Google AdSense. Most web searches are through Google. Makes sense for them to try and send you to properties where they might make some more money off of you.

ah I thought you meant without ads

Reply on news.ycombinator.com