Even Abraham Lincoln's statue got torn down in Portland, OR last year. Not because he was a slaveowner but because he oversaw expulsion of Native Americans from their land and executed 36 Native prisoners. I would not assume that any president's statue is safe from public ire.
Maybe the same will happen with meat. Veal, foie gras, shark fin, octopus, endangered animals, etc. Most of the blame will fall on producers, but “carnivorous” over eaters like Ron Swanson from parks and rec might age poorly.
Whenever people bring up gay marriage legality, I think it’s also important to show this graph. https://xkcd.com/1431/
Expect live meat to be overwhelmingly abhorred before you see a ban.
It might not be a coincidence that he was targetted as being perhaps the most racist genocidal President.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_twenty-dollar_bi...
All that not to mention, it's ridiculous to be putting someone who didn't think the US should have a central bank on the US's money.
Statues, money, and the like are how we communicate to the world and ourselves reminders of those whose lives we find worth emulating. As our morals change and we start to find things like slavery, forced death-marches and ethnic cleansing abhorrent, is it really wrong for us to update our imagery of whose lives we should emulate? At least to stop idolizing those people who were most notable for, or even raised arms in insurrection in support of, those acts?
He's the reason the Democratic Party exists, sure that's worth something…
It's also not clear to me that, its whole ~200 year lifespan considered, the Democratic Party has put its average in the green relative to historical atrocity (nor, for that matter, have the GOP).