Hacker News Reader

Comment by dantheman | Hacker News Reader

By improving efficiency we are improving the quality of life of those around the world. Due to rapid improvements in technology those in the poorest countries can now easily access information, entertainment, books, knowledge from anywhere in the world at remarkably low cost -> Greatly improving their quality of life (if we agree that life like we have in the west is the goal).

View on HN

What's the point of completely automating everything if you still have to work 40 hours a week?

Why do you still have to work 40 hours a week once everything is automated?

The problem there though is that those working have little interest in paying say 50% tax to support those who they have put out if work with increased efficiency.

Automating tasks allows us to work on tasks that we don't know how to automate and leads to innovation.

Due to rapid improvements in technology those in the poorest countries can now easily access information, entertainment, books, knowledge from anywhere in the world at remarkably low cost -> Greatly improving their quality of life...

I find it unlikely that someone who is put out of a job by new efficiencies would find much solace in low cost YouTube access. It's precisely this blind faith in efficiency as a measure of progress that I question. I'm not saying it's always bad, but it's clear now that improved efficiency is not always good. We need to find new, more suitable metrics by which to measure progress.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com