Open source is the only stuff that doesn't reliably leave gaping wholes laying around for years because anyone can pay to have them fixed.
That’s simply false. I really love open-source but to even imply that it is not a ticking bomb of security is just naive.
Why? There's a world of difference between a rich corporation marketing and selling products to consumers and developers publishing some code on the web. It is obvious to me that society expects a lot more from the former.
I disagree. FOSS and commercially licensed (and sold) software with EULAs are two very different things, and can be distinguished in whatever legal language implements these theoretical liabilities
Open source stuff is typically distributed with a massive all-caps warranty disclaimer. If it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.